HHomilitics

Man's Weakness--God's Anointing

Charles Haddon Spurgeon · September 9, 1860

At Metropolitan Tabernacle

Sermon synthesis

AI-assisted analysis for orientation; read the source transcript or listen to the sermon to evaluate the interpretation.

The sermon interprets David’s confession of weakness as a picture of believers who are truly anointed yet still weak in themselves. Spurgeon distinguishes weakness in the flesh from weakness in God, insisting that God’s strength and promise remain sufficient. He strongly teaches effectual calling and the perseverance of the saints: those who truly trust Christ will not finally perish. The sermon ends with an urgent invitation for sinners to flee to Christ, where they will find salvation, security, and everlasting life.

Theological center: God sovereignly saves and preserves those united to Christ, so human weakness, resistance, sin, Satan, and death cannot overturn His purpose.

Applications: Trust Christ for salvation · Rely on God’s strength · Consider weakness and anointing · Trust God’s sovereign purpose

Primary texts: 2 Samuel 3:39 · Ephesians 2:6 · Mark 16:16

Scripture references

Public transcript excerpt

“I am this day weak, though anointed king; and these men the sons of Zeruiah be too hard for me.” 2 Samuel 3:39 YOU will remember that David was secretly anointed king over Israel by Samuel, but he waited many a weary year before the crown actually rested upon his head. For a long time he was an exile from the very country of which he was afterwards to be the sovereign. He was hunted about by the remorseless cruelty of Saul till he became like a partridge upon the mountains, and the feet of the wild roe were not more used to flight than those of David. A band of men gradually gathered round him, over whom he became the captain, and he lived the life of an adventurer, the leader of heroic soldiers, who at once protected their country from its foreign foes, and sheltered its disaffected subjects. At last Saul fell in battle upon Mount Gilboa, and Jonathan, the heir-at-law to the throne, also fell upon that dewless mountain. David was assured of the death of Saul by the fact that the head of the king was brought to him by an Amalekite, whose crime he punished with death, though he hoped to have been rewarded with abundance of treasure. David’s own kinsmen at once recognized him as the leader of their clan, and he, in Hebron, began to reign over Judah and the south of the country, but the mass of the nation had not yielded to him, and Abner the commander-in-chief of Saul’s standing army, fearful lest he might lose his influence and be supplanted by Joab, who naturally would become commander-in-chief under David, set up Ishbosheth as the successor of Saul, and so there became two kingdoms—David was the acknowledged head of the one, and Ishbosheth, the master of the larger part of the territory. Abner was playing king-maker and he soon showed that he felt his power and meant to use it, having engaged in a quarrel with Ishbosheth, on account of Abner’s desire to take to wife a concubine of Saul, he at once resented the interference of Ishbosheth, and determined to put down the king whom he himself had put up. He came to David therefore, and made terms with him, upon which he would give him up the kingdom, and Ishbosheth would cease to be his rival. Joab hears of this, and not wishing to be supplanted, and perhaps seriously believing that Abner was not honest, follows after him, entices him back, and just outside the walls of Hebron, a city of refuge, slays him in cold blood—a most dastardly and treacherous murder! David had nothing to do with it, he did his best to exonerate himself from it, and pronounced an awful curse upon Joab the murderer, and upon all hi…

Read the full transcript on Homilitics →

Explore related pages