HHomilitics

A Single Eye and Simple Faith

Charles Haddon Spurgeon · September 16, 1860

At Metropolitan Tabernacle

Sermon synthesis

AI-assisted analysis for orientation; read the source transcript or listen to the sermon to evaluate the interpretation.

The sermon interprets the single eye as undivided spiritual vision and allegiance. Spurgeon strongly rejects any attempt to combine Christ’s saving work with human merit, ceremonies, moral achievement, or religious performance. Sinners are invited to come to Christ helpless and empty-handed, trusting His completed righteousness and atonement alone. Faith is not presented as passive assent: it gives sight, produces obedience, and directs the whole Christian life toward Christ’s glory. The church is challenged to reject worldly approval and live with a consistent, courageous witness.

Theological center: Salvation is accomplished by Christ alone through His finished atoning work and received by faith apart from human merit, with genuine faith producing obedience.

Applications: Come to Christ empty-handed · Trust Christ wholly · Obey Christ willingly · Advance against sin

Primary texts: Matthew 6:22-23 · 2 Corinthians 5:7 · Hebrews 11:1

Scripture references

Public transcript excerpt

“The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light. But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness.” Matthew 6:22-23 THIS sentence has in it the nature of a proverb. It is well worthy of frequent quotation, as it is applicable to such various circumstances. It is one of the most pithy, sententious utterances of our Savior. So full of meaning is it that it would be utterly impossible for us to draw out all its analogies. It is capable of adaptation to so many different things that the ablest commentators despair of being able to give you the whole of its fullness. But remark, that very much of the meaning is to be discovered by the use, as the varieties of our personal experience furnish varieties of practical reflection. For example, we may interpret the passage of conscience as the eye of the soul—conscience must be clear and simple. If the conscience, which is the candle of the Lord, and which searches the secret parts of the belly, be not light but darkness, how great must the darkness be! If a man has not enough conscience to know darkness from light, and light from darkness, and he puts bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter, if that only power, on which seem to tremble some rays of the ancient light of manhood, be darkened—if the lighthouse be quenched, if the windows be sealed up— how great indeed, must be the darkness of man! We cannot wonder, when once a man has a depraved and seared conscience, that he runs into iniquity willingly, commits sin with both hands, and goes from step to step till he obtains the highest seat in the scale of sin. The symbol of the eye here may also refer to the understanding, taken in a yet broader sense than as the conscience, for, I suppose, that conscience is after all, but the understanding exercised about moral truth. If the understanding of man be dark, how dark must be man’s soul! If that which judges, and weighs, and tests, if that which is to us the teacher, the recorder of the town of Mansoul, if that be amiss, if the recorder makes wrong entries, if the understanding has bad scales and uses divers weights, how gross indeed, must be the ignorance of man! What! Seal up the windows of the house, surely the thickness of the walls will not so much keep away the light as the sealing up of the windows. Let but the understanding be enlightened, and the rays will diffuse themselves, and illuminate every faculty of the whole man, but ah, if it be darkened, man is in darkness as respects all his powers. Yet again, the term “eye” may also resp…

Read the full transcript on Homilitics →

Explore related pages